Complexity of Merkle Ethereum Way Verification

When checking the transactions in Blockchain Ethereum, one of the most critical aspects is Merle’s full path. This applies to a complex mathematical process that allows users to verify the authenticity and integrity of the transaction, linking to the entire history of blocks.

When trying to simplify the verification process, you can only have one temptation to have an individual transaction A and B without considering the implication of Merle’s full path. This approach, however, will not guarantee sufficient guarantee of the validity of the transaction. Let’s go why.

Merkle’s full path

Merkle’s full path serves as a Work Proof Chain (JED), which connects each block with its direct predecessor. This allows users to check the following properties:

• Transaction integrity : All block history is related, ensuring the detection of all individual transactions modifications.

• Block Validation : The hash of each transaction is verified, checking to fit the expected exit of the previously calculated merle path.

Why Hash only A and B would not be enough

As soon as the hash a and b transaction without considering Merle’s full path, there are several problems:

• This would allow a malicious activity subjected.

• Without this, users may not be able to verify the authenticity of transactions or detect possible manipulations.

• Greater complexity : hash only A and B without considering the entire history of blocks would significantly increase the computing load required for verification. This can lead to problems with scalability and reduced usability.

Better approach: Mixing Merkle’s full path

To safely check the transaction in the Blockchain Ethereum, you need to use the full merle path. Here’s why:

• Improved safety : The complete merle path ensures the detection of any individual transaction modifications and can be easily identified.

• Simplified Verification : hash only A and B would require users to understand complex cryptographic concepts that may not be viable for all users.

• Increased scalability

  

  : Based on Merle’s full path, Ethereum programmers have implemented a more efficient and scalable solution that allows for greater block size, maintaining safety.

Application

Although only transaction A and B may seem a simpler approach, it would threaten the integrity and transparency of the entire history of the block. Merkle’s full path provides significant guarantees regarding the ID and authenticity of transactions in Blockchain Ethereum. By using this complex stage, but key to the verification process, users can enjoy greater security and certainly when interacting with their favorite cryptocurrencies.

Sources

• “Ethereum 1.0: a new era for intelligent contracts” Vitalik Buterin

• “Merle Path Verification of Transactions on Ethereum” by Ethereum Warmia (2015)

• “Standard Bitcoin: How to get an advantage in the Scott Lawrence Cryptographic Revolution